BSRLM

British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics

  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Solidarity Fund
    • Constitution
    • AGM Papers and Minutes
    • Leone Burton Fund
    • Janet Duffin Fund, Award and Lecture
    • BERA Special Interest Group on Mathematics in Education
    • Copyright statement
  • Publications
    • Proceedings of BSRLM day conferences
    • Research in Mathematics Education
    • BCME Conference Proceedings and Occasional publications
    • BSRLM Conference Proceedings Template
  • Events
    • Future Conferences
    • Working Groups
    • New Researchers’ Day
    • BERA SIG Events
    • Previous Conferences
    • Gallery
    • Conference Keynotes
  • Members
    • Members’ area
    • Become a member of BSRLM
  • News
  • blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Log In

BSRLM Proceedings: Vol 15 No 1 March 1995

Proceedings of the Day Conference held at the University of Birmingham, March 1995

PLEASE NOTE: These IPs have been scanned and reconstituted from the printed versions. Although the pagination has been maintained, there may be some odd discrepancies from the original – if anything is glaringly wrong or misleading please let our webmaster know with a correction, full details of the paper, page and sufficient detail to locate the error.

Contents

1 Justifying and Proving In The Mathematics Classroom

Dennis Almeida
University of Exeter

In the current post-Cockcroft era the learner of school mathematics engages with proof in an informal way. Through personal investigations and problem solving the learner is introduced to process skills such as conjecturing, generalising, and justifying. Recent research (Cae and Ruthven, 1994) reports that the proof-practices of advanced learners are predominantly empirical. These practices are nevertheless valuable: such proofs convince their [roducers and, under certain circumstances, empirical proof-practices may be precursors to deductive ones.

2 Teachers’ Use of Generic Examples

Liz Bills
Centre for Mathematics Education, Open University

I describe my understanding of a teaching technique which I have labelled as “generic example” and the responses made to this description by a group of teachers. I consider some similarities and differences between my examples of the use of the technique and the teachers ‘examples.

3 Investigating the Mathematics Learning of Student Teachers: Explorations and Discoveries?

Paul Blanc
King Alfred’s College (Winchester), Institute of Education, London

This paper describes a single experiment from early stages of work in progress. It examines one student’s work in depth following the analysis of a class set of solutions of first year teacher trainees and mathematics students for a well-known investigation.

4 Planning for Mathematics Teaching: Perceptions of Experienced and Trainee Teachers

Cherry Edwards
School of Education, University of Southampton

This paper is concerned with planning as an activity at the core of mathematics educators’ work. Through analyses of reflective writings and course tasks, the dimensions of planning are considered in relation to discrete groups of mathematics teachers: trainees, mentors and MA students. The paper explores links between theory about and practice of planning and how we can understand the planning activities of practising teachers.

5 Gender, Courses and Curricula effects on Students’ Attitudes to Mathematical Modelling in 16-19 Mathematics Programmes

J. I. Kyeleve and J. S. Williams
School of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester

In 1993, Mathematical modelling was codified as a compulsory core component of all U.K “A’ level mathematics curricula. This study examines the attitudes (enjoyability, anxiety and confidence) of 269 students to mathematical modelling in 16-19 mathematics programmes. The students’ attitudes were found to be multi¬dimensional and varied significantly across the sub-scales. Gender and curricular factors and the effect of course combinations taken by the students showed mixed results.

6 Promoting Reflective Practice Amongst Mathematics Novice Teachers: Are the Perceived Benefits Related to Novices’ Learning Styles?

Susan Martin
School of Education, University of Bath

Whilst the goal of developing critical reflective practitioners might be appropriate for all novice teachers Kolb’s work suggests that learning should be matched to learning style and this raises a question of whether the methods used, largely reflective writing, are appropriate for all novice teachers regardless of their learning style. Determining the extent to which novices’ learning styles affect the irifluence of tools used to promote reflective practice is neither simple to investigate nor easy to recognise. Two factors which merit consideration are the extent to which discussion of the ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of reflective practice are given adequate attention across the course components and, secondly, the extent to which the potential of reflective writing is not realised because the contextsfor the tasks and assignments do not connect meaningfully with novice teachers’ personal theories and experience.

7 Teacher Designed Software

Declan O’Reilly
University of Sheffield

Teachers have always gone beyond the textbook or scheme to design worksheets or other materials geared to the-needs of their children. However, until recently, the parallel activity in a computer environment was not possible. This paper describes some research with year 5 children (ages 9 to 10) in which the medium of Boxer ¬was used to introduce itself. Altogether, eight case-study children representing the full ability range were closely observed using three microworlds known as ‘First-‘, ‘Second-‘ and ‘Third-Boxer’. However, the microworlds were also being used simultaneously by the remainder of the year 5 class in so far as time, hardware and other classroom limitations allowed. The feedback from these two sets of users formed an integral component of the iterative design process.

8 The Equation, the Whole Equation and Nothing But the Equation!

Susan Pirie
Mathematics Education Research Centre, University Of Oxford

This presentation addresses one teacher’s method of teaching linear equations to a low ability group of pupils. It is a method that has them solving, with understanding, the most general forms of equations such as 3x-7=5x-29. The teacher treats the equations as ‘mathematics’, with no recourse to images from pseudo-real life, and he confronts the problems inherent in coming to a fuller understanding of the equals sign, by presenting the equation as a static entity rather than a dynamic instruction to perform some arithmetical action. Common methods of teaching the topic are summarised and the author claims that the notion of a “didactic cut”, identified by some researchers, is simply an artefact of certain teaching approaches. Its effects are not seen in this classroom.

9 Peer Tutoring as Part of a Research Design

Andrew Tee

This reports describes part of a pilot study investigating language use in the mathematics classroom. It focuses on the language used in a peer tutoring situation. I shall describe the theoretical background tothe study and illustrate the outcomes with a description and discussion of one incident.

10 Pattern v Structure

Peter Winbourne
South Bank University

This paper discusses the nature of the mathematical activity which may be expected to accompany the developing understanding of pattern – in particular an understanding that admits of abstraction of structure and thus classification, in this case, of frieze patterns. Some activities involving the use of COOri Geometre to explore pattern are described. These activities and a review of some of the pattern literature are used as a basis for discussion of the process of objectification which is held to characterise understanding in this context. The pedagogical implications of acknowledgment of a process/object distinction are illustrated through consideration of some work done by undergraduate students.

11 Working Group Interviewing – A Support Group

Laurinda Brown
University of Bristol, School of Education

This group met for the fIrst time at Birmingham with a focus of introducing ourselves and the work we were currently undertaking to raise issues for consideration in future sessions. It seemed important to be aware that the membership of the group will not be stable. Those present may not be able to attend every BSRLM meeting and others may be interested in particular concerns of the group. Consequently, the planning for future meetings will take place at the end of each session and, presumably, if there is no common concern emerging, the life of the group will have ended.

Our Aim

BSRLM is for people interested in research and scholarship in mathematics education and provides a supportive and inclusive environment for both new and experienced researchers to develop their ideas.

Become a Member

Members of BSRLM can attend and present at our termly Day Conferences. You will also receive the three annual issues of Research in Mathematics Education published for BSRLM by Taylor and Francis.
Join BSRLM

Social

  • Bluesky
  • E-mail

Latest Bluesky posts

Contact

Chair:
Alf Coles
Secretary:
Laurie Jacques
Treasurer:
Dave Hewitt
Membership Coordinator:
Rosa Archer


Outreach Coordinator:
Ouhao Chen
Publications Officer:
Taro Fujita
Day Conference Organisers:
Cristina Mio and Bohan Liu
Online Communications Coordinator:
Karen Skilling

© Copyright 2023 BSRLM · All Rights Reserved · All Logos & Trademark Belongs To Their Respective Owners · Web Design Agency - Bowler Hat